What Is Griefing As A Smart Contract Attack Vector?
Griefing is an attack vector in smart contract game theory where a malicious actor spends a small amount of money (gas fees) to force a legitimate user to spend a disproportionately large amount of money or resources. The goal is to disrupt the user experience or force a denial-of-service without necessarily stealing the victim's funds.
Go Back
🕒 7:33 PM
📅 Oct 29, 2025
✍️ By Nathanael707
Defining the Griefing AttackA Griefing Attack is financially inefficient for the attacker but highly destructive for the victim. It exploits the asymmetry of costs in a transaction, where a cheap, small action by the attacker can trigger a cascading, expensive state change for the victim.
Asymmetry of Cost: Attacker's cost is minimal; victim's cost (gas fees, opportunity loss) is maximal.
Motive: Disruption, annoyance, or forcing a competitor to leave a market; not direct financial theft.
Result: A localized Denial-of-Service (DoS) that prevents legitimate users from interacting with a contract or makes the interaction too expensive.
Mitigation Strategies
Developers must design contracts to prevent the attacker from having excessive control over costly state changes.
Economic Disincentives: Requiring a high collateral or stake to initiate a sensitive transaction.
Gas Limits: Hard-coding reasonable gas limits on functions that are vulnerable to being forced into an expensive loop.